Bartow County v. Young

95 S.E. 977, 148 Ga. 110, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 209
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 15, 1918·No. No. 642·Published

Opinion

Beck, P. J.

This was an equitable petition to restrain the County of Bartow, its agents and officers, from maintaining a certain road in a condition described, and from maintaining certain drains and ditches across the road. Under the conflicting evidence in the case the court did not err in granting the interlocutory injunction prayed. City of Atlanta v. Warnock, 91 Ga. 210 (18 S. E. 135, 23 L. R. A. 301, 44 Am. St. R. 17); Goodrich v. Georgia R. Co., 115 Ga. 340 (41 S. E. 659); Oostanaula Mining Co. v. Miller, 145 Ga. 90 (88 S. E. 562); Sweetman v. Owens, 147 Ga. 436 (94 S. E. 542).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, G. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bartow County v. Young, 95 S.E. 977, 148 Ga. 110, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 209 (Ga. 1918).

95 S.E. 977 (Bartow County v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Atlanta v. Warnock
23 L.R.A. 301 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1892)
Goodrich v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.
41 S.E. 659 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Oostanaula Mining Co. v. Miller
88 S.E. 562 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)
Sweetman v. Owens
94 S.E. 542 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1917)