Bartow County v. Young

95 S.E. 977, 148 Ga. 110, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 209
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 15, 1918
DocketNo. 642
StatusPublished

This text of 95 S.E. 977 (Bartow County v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bartow County v. Young, 95 S.E. 977, 148 Ga. 110, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 209 (Ga. 1918).

Opinion

Beck, P. J.

This was an equitable petition to restrain the County of Bartow, its agents and officers, from maintaining a certain road in a condition described, and from maintaining certain drains and ditches across the road. Under the conflicting evidence in the case the court did not err in granting the interlocutory injunction prayed. City of Atlanta v. Warnock, 91 Ga. 210 (18 S. E. 135, 23 L. R. A. 301, 44 Am. St. R. 17); Goodrich v. Georgia R. Co., 115 Ga. 340 (41 S. E. 659); Oostanaula Mining Co. v. Miller, 145 Ga. 90 (88 S. E. 562); Sweetman v. Owens, 147 Ga. 436 (94 S. E. 542).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, G. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Atlanta v. Warnock
23 L.R.A. 301 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1892)
Goodrich v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.
41 S.E. 659 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Oostanaula Mining Co. v. Miller
88 S.E. 562 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)
Sweetman v. Owens
94 S.E. 542 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 S.E. 977, 148 Ga. 110, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bartow-county-v-young-ga-1918.