Bartosik v. Filippo
89 A.D.2d 738, 452 N.Y.S.2d 863, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17863
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 26, 1982
StatusPublished
This text of 89 A.D.2d 738 (Bartosik v. Filippo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bartosik v. Filippo, 89 A.D.2d 738, 452 N.Y.S.2d 863, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17863 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).
Opinion
Motion to dismiss,appeal as moot granted, without costs, on the ground that it does not involve phenomenon typically evading review (see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715). The merits of the appeal have not been considered. Sweeney, J. P., Kane, Main, Mikoll and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hearst Corp. v. Clyne
409 N.E.2d 876 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
89 A.D.2d 738, 452 N.Y.S.2d 863, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bartosik-v-filippo-nyappdiv-1982.