Bartosik v. Filippo
89 A.D.2d 738, 452 N.Y.S.2d 863, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17863
Opinion
Motion to dismiss,appeal as moot granted, without costs, on the ground that it does not involve phenomenon typically evading review (see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715). The merits of the appeal have not been considered. Sweeney, J. P., Kane, Main, Mikoll and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bartosik v. Filippo, 89 A.D.2d 738, 452 N.Y.S.2d 863, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17863 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).
89 A.D.2d 738 (Bartosik v. Filippo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hearst Corp. v. Clyne
409 N.E.2d 876 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)