Bartosiewicz v. Stanley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bartosiewicz v. Stanley

16 A.D.2d 860, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9707

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 16, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 16 A.D.2d 860 (Bartosiewicz v. Stanley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bartosiewicz v. Stanley, 16 A.D.2d 860, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9707 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Special Term correctly determined that there was an [861]*861insufficient showing of actual damages to sustain a fine for the full amount of the judgment. It appears from the affidavit of the attorney for the judgment creditor that the actual value of the transferred property may be recoverable from the leviable interest in the 1961 automobile of the judgment debtor. Order affirmed, without costs. Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Special Term correctly determined that there was an [861]*861insufficient showing of actual damages to sustain a fine for the full amount of the judgment. It appears from the affidavit of the attorney for the judgment creditor that the actual value of the transferred property may be recoverable from the leviable interest in the 1961 automobile of the judgment debtor. Order affirmed, without costs. Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.2d 860, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bartosiewicz-v-stanley-nyappdiv-1962.