Barton v. W & M PROPERTIES

283 S.W.3d 830, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 746, 2009 WL 1524852
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 2, 2009
DocketED 92141
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 283 S.W.3d 830 (Barton v. W & M PROPERTIES) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barton v. W & M PROPERTIES, 283 S.W.3d 830, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 746, 2009 WL 1524852 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

W & M Properties (“Employer”) appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“the Commission”) finding in favor of Thomas Barton (“Employee”) on his workers’ compensation claim against Employer. Employer claims the Commission erred in finding the accident arose out of and in the course of employment pursuant to Section 287.120 1 .

*831 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo 2000 unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Johnson
283 S.W.3d 830 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
283 S.W.3d 830, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 746, 2009 WL 1524852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barton-v-w-m-properties-moctapp-2009.