Barton v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Barton v. United States

774 A.2d 1107, 2001 D.C. App. LEXIS 133, 2001 WL 668210

District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided June 14, 2001·No. Nos. 98-CF-110, 98-CF-519·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the joint petition of appellants for rehearing or rehearing en banc, and the opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED by the merits division* that the joint petition for rehearing is granted and the memorandum opinion and judgment of January 12, 2001, is hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for rehearing en banc is denied as moot. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule these matters for argument before the merits division as soon as the calendar permits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the joint petition of appellants for rehearing or rehearing en banc, and the opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED by the merits division* that the joint petition for rehearing is granted and the memorandum opinion and judgment of January 12, 2001, is hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for rehearing en banc is denied as moot. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule these matters for argument before the merits division as soon as the calendar permits.

Barton v. United States, 774 A.2d 1107, 2001 D.C. App. LEXIS 133, 2001 WL 668210 (D.C. 2001).

Pincite

774 A.2d 1107 (Barton v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.