Barton v. State

728 So. 2d 340, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2676, 1999 WL 129467
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Barton v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 704 So. 2d 569
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 12, 1999·No. No. 98-1859·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s rule 3.800 motion. However, we reverse that part of the order which imposes sanctions barring appellant from filing any further pro se pleadings in this ease and remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinions in Boston v. State, 722 So.2d 250 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), and Spencer v. State, 717 So.2d 95 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part.

BARFIELD, C.J., VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barton v. State, 728 So. 2d 340, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2676, 1999 WL 129467 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

728 So. 2d 340 (Barton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boston v. State
722 So. 2d 250 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Spencer v. State
717 So. 2d 95 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)