Barton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Barton v. State

728 So. 2d 340, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2676, 1999 WL 129467

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 12, 1999

DocketNo. 98-1859

StatusPublished

This text of 728 So. 2d 340 (Barton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barton v. State, 728 So. 2d 340, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2676, 1999 WL 129467 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s rule 3.800 motion. However, we reverse that part of the order which imposes sanctions barring appellant from filing any further pro se pleadings in this ease and remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinions in Boston v. State, 722 So.2d 250 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), and Spencer v. State, 717 So.2d 95 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part.

BARFIELD, C.J., VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s rule 3.800 motion. However, we reverse that part of the order which imposes sanctions barring appellant from filing any further pro se pleadings in this ease and remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinions in Boston v. State, 722 So.2d 250 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), and Spencer v. State, 717 So.2d 95 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part.

BARFIELD, C.J., VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

728 So. 2d 340, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2676, 1999 WL 129467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barton-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack