Barton v. State

585 So. 2d 1125, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9475, 1991 WL 180724
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 12, 1991·No. No. 90-3719·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion for credit upon his sentence pursuant to Rule 3.800, F.R.Cr.P., without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek such relief by new motion requesting production of documents which may demonstrate entitlement to the relief sought.

WIGGINTON and WOLF, JJ., and WENTWORTH, Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barton v. State, 585 So. 2d 1125, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9475, 1991 WL 180724 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

585 So. 2d 1125 (Barton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bell v. State
585 So. 2d 1125 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)