Barton v. State

585 So. 2d 1125, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9475, 1991 WL 180724
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 12, 1991
DocketNo. 90-3719
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 585 So. 2d 1125 (Barton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barton v. State, 585 So. 2d 1125, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9475, 1991 WL 180724 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion for credit upon his sentence pursuant to Rule 3.800, F.R.Cr.P., without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek such relief by new motion requesting production of documents which may demonstrate entitlement to the relief sought.

WIGGINTON and WOLF, JJ., and WENTWORTH, Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bell v. State
585 So. 2d 1125 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
585 So. 2d 1125, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9475, 1991 WL 180724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barton-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.