Barton v. Rowell

64 A. 1135, 73 N.H. 606, 1905 N.H. LEXIS 84
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedJune 29, 1905
StatusPublished

This text of 64 A. 1135 (Barton v. Rowell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barton v. Rowell, 64 A. 1135, 73 N.H. 606, 1905 N.H. LEXIS 84 (N.H. 1905).

Opinion

Walker, J.

“A new trial may be granted in any case, when through accident, mistake, or misfortune justice has not been done and a further hearing would be "equitable.” P. S., e. 230, s. 1. After a verdict for the plaintiff, the defendant filed a petition in the superior court under this .statute, alleging that new evidence had been discovered which upon another trial would change the result. Upon this petition the defendant introduced evidence tending to prove his position, but the court dismissed the petition, and the defendant excepted. The ground for dismissing the petition is not stated, and no question of law is necessarily raised by the exception. The order of the court does not appear to be erroneous.

^Exception overruled.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 A. 1135, 73 N.H. 606, 1905 N.H. LEXIS 84, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barton-v-rowell-nh-1905.