Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Barton v. Paul

Barton v. Paul

230 A.D. 749
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1930
StatusPublished

This text of 230 A.D. 749 (Barton v. Paul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barton v. Paul, 230 A.D. 749 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Hinman, Davis, Whitmyer and Hasbrouek, JJ., concur; Van Kirk, P. J., votes to reverse and dismiss complaint because of the contributory negligence of the plaintiff on undisputed evidence. (Baker v. Close, 137 App. Div. 529; affd., 204 N. Y. 92; Knapp v. Barrett, 216 id. 226, 232: Dolfini v. Erie R. R. Co., 178 id. 1, 4; Wood v. Pace, 220 App. Div. 386; affd., 250 N. Y. 556; Barker v. Savage, 45 id. 191.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baker v. . Close
97 N.E. 501 (New York Court of Appeals, 1912)
Wood v. Pace
166 N.E. 322 (New York Court of Appeals, 1929)
Baker v. Close
137 A.D. 529 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)
Wood v. Pace
220 A.D. 386 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
230 A.D. 749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barton-v-paul-nyappdiv-1930.