Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Barton v. Paul

Barton v. Paul

230 A.D. 749
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1930·Published

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Hinman, Davis, Whitmyer and Hasbrouek, JJ., concur; Van Kirk, P. J., votes to reverse and dismiss complaint because of the contributory negligence of the plaintiff on undisputed evidence. (Baker v. Close, 137 App. Div. 529; affd., 204 N. Y. 92; Knapp v. Barrett, 216 id. 226, 232: Dolfini v. Erie R. R. Co., 178 id. 1, 4; Wood v. Pace, 220 App. Div. 386; affd., 250 N. Y. 556; Barker v. Savage, 45 id. 191.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barton v. Paul, 230 A.D. 749 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

230 A.D. 749 (Barton v. Paul) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baker v. . Close
97 N.E. 501 (New York Court of Appeals, 1912)
Wood v. Pace
166 N.E. 322 (New York Court of Appeals, 1929)
Baker v. Close
137 A.D. 529 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)
Wood v. Pace
220 A.D. 386 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927)