Barton v. Olshan

260 S.E.2d 83, 244 Ga. 341, 1979 Ga. LEXIS 1228
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 26, 1979
Docket35026
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 260 S.E.2d 83 (Barton v. Olshan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barton v. Olshan, 260 S.E.2d 83, 244 Ga. 341, 1979 Ga. LEXIS 1228 (Ga. 1979).

Opinion

Per curiam.

The trial court did not err in ruling that specific performance would lie in favor of appellees against Barton, construing these numerous simultaneous contracts together as is required by Hardin v. Great Northern Nekoosa Corp., 237 Ga. 594 (229 SE2d 371) (1976). The rights and liabilities flowing from the various documents may not be considered in isolation from each other. Rizk v. Jones, 243 Ga. 545 (255 SE2d 19) (1979).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Hill, J., not participating

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jose Maiz v. Amir Virani
253 F.3d 641 (Eleventh Circuit, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
260 S.E.2d 83, 244 Ga. 341, 1979 Ga. LEXIS 1228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barton-v-olshan-ga-1979.