Barton v. Olshan
This text of 260 S.E.2d 83 (Barton v. Olshan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The trial court did not err in ruling that specific performance would lie in favor of appellees against Barton, construing these numerous simultaneous contracts together as is required by Hardin v. Great Northern Nekoosa Corp., 237 Ga. 594 (229 SE2d 371) (1976). The rights and liabilities flowing from the various documents may not be considered in isolation from each other. Rizk v. Jones, 243 Ga. 545 (255 SE2d 19) (1979).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
260 S.E.2d 83, 244 Ga. 341, 1979 Ga. LEXIS 1228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barton-v-olshan-ga-1979.