Barton v. Hicks

Indiana Court of Appeals

Barton v. Hicks

209 N.E.2d 736, 137 Ind. App. 452, 1965 Ind. App. LEXIS 605

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 24, 1965

DocketNo. 20,422

StatusPublished

This text of 209 N.E.2d 736 (Barton v. Hicks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barton v. Hicks, 209 N.E.2d 736, 137 Ind. App. 452, 1965 Ind. App. LEXIS 605 (Ind. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Bierly, C. J.

On July 16, 1965, appellant, Harold Barton, by his attorneys, Galvin, Galvin & Leeney, filed a petition for extension of time within which to file transcript., and assignment of errors. Acknowledgment of service was accepted by appellees, by their attorneys, Crumpacker & Abrahamson.

Appellant, on August 2, 1965, filed a motion entitled “Dismissal of Appeal”, which informed the court that the matter in controversy between the parties to the action had been “amicably settled” and, hence, appellant requested this~appeal to be dismissed. Notice , of motion to dismiss appeal , was sent by mail to appellees by appellant.

Said motion was submitted to the court for finding and determination;

And the court now finds that, inasmuch as appellees have filed no objections to appellant’s motion to dismiss and matters in controversy between the parties have been adjusted, said motion to dismiss appeal should be sustained and the appeal should be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed, costs to. be assessed against appellant.

Note. — Reported in 209 N. E. 2d 736.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI