Barton v. Georgia Fruit Package Manufacturing Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Barton v. Georgia Fruit Package Manufacturing Co.

85 S.E. 933, 16 Ga. App. 619, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 158

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 30, 1915

Docket5979

StatusPublished

This text of 85 S.E. 933 (Barton v. Georgia Fruit Package Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barton v. Georgia Fruit Package Manufacturing Co., 85 S.E. 933, 16 Ga. App. 619, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 158 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Wade, J.

1. The legal questions involved were fairly submitted by the charge of the court, and the finding of the jury upon the issues of fact is conclusive, since there was evidence to support the verdict.

2. If any fuller charge had been desired as to any feature of the defense interposed, a timely request therefor should have been submitted in writing.

3. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wade, J.

1. The legal questions involved were fairly submitted by the charge of the court, and the finding of the jury upon the issues of fact is conclusive, since there was evidence to support the verdict.

2. If any fuller charge had been desired as to any feature of the defense interposed, a timely request therefor should have been submitted in writing.

3. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 S.E. 933, 16 Ga. App. 619, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barton-v-georgia-fruit-package-manufacturing-co-gactapp-1915.