Barton v. Craighill
112 A. 96, 268 Pa. 464, 1920 Pa. LEXIS 718
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 31, 1920·No. Appeal, No. 178·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
This judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the learned president judge of the court below granting defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barton v. Craighill, 112 A. 96, 268 Pa. 464, 1920 Pa. LEXIS 718 (Pa. 1920).
112 A. 96 (Barton v. Craighill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Seader v. Philadelphia
54 A.2d 701 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1946)
Miller v. Utah Light & Traction Co.
86 P.2d 37 (Utah Supreme Court, 1939)
Osby v. Tarlton
85 S.W.2d 27 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1935)
Dorris v. Bridgman & Co.
145 A. 827 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1928)