Barton v. Association of the Bar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Barton v. Association of the Bar

13 A.D.2d 479, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11938

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 21, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 13 A.D.2d 479 (Barton v. Association of the Bar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barton v. Association of the Bar, 13 A.D.2d 479, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11938 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for an order, pursuant to section 90 of the Judiciary Law of the State of New York, directing the Association of the Bar of the City of New York to divulge to petitioner and his attorneys certain documents and minutes of proceedings relating to the conduct, disbarment and applications for reinstatement of Herman C. Pollack, granted to the extent of directing that there be made available to the moving party and also to Herman C. Pollock all documents called for, but not including those excepted to in the opposing affidavit of Eric Nightingale sworn to February 23, 1961. This disposition is without prejudice to any further application by either the movant or Herman C. Pollack after the material in question has been furnished. In all other respects, the motion is denied. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for an order, pursuant to section 90 of the Judiciary Law of the State of New York, directing the Association of the Bar of the City of New York to divulge to petitioner and his attorneys certain documents and minutes of proceedings relating to the conduct, disbarment and applications for reinstatement of Herman C. Pollack, granted to the extent of directing that there be made available to the moving party and also to Herman C. Pollock all documents called for, but not including those excepted to in the opposing affidavit of Eric Nightingale sworn to February 23, 1961. This disposition is without prejudice to any further application by either the movant or Herman C. Pollack after the material in question has been furnished. In all other respects, the motion is denied. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.2d 479, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barton-v-association-of-the-bar-nyappdiv-1961.