Bartolotta v. Delco Appliance Corp.
254 A.D. 809, 4 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7697
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 4, 1938·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
Order so far as appealed from affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: We find no .abuse .of discretion on the part of the Special Term in granting the part of the order from which the appeal is taken. All concur. (The portion of the order appealed from denies defendant’s motion to require plaintiff to submit to the taking of a barium meal, as part of a physical examination before trial.) Present — Sears, P. J., Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bartolotta v. Delco Appliance Corp., 254 A.D. 809, 4 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7697 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).
254 A.D. 809 (Bartolotta v. Delco Appliance Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lefkowitz v. Nassau County Medical Center
94 A.D.2d 18 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Adlerstein v. South Nassau Communities Hospital
109 Misc. 2d 158 (New York Supreme Court, 1981)
Swiatlowski v. Kasprzyk
3 A.D.2d 261 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)
Swiatlowski v. Kasprzyk
2 Misc. 2d 707 (New York Supreme Court, 1956)
Cardinal v. University of Rochester
188 Misc. 823 (New York Supreme Court, 1946)
Carrig v. Oakes
259 A.D. 138 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)