Bartolotta v. Bartolotta

206 A.D. 678

Opinion

Order reversed on the law, without costs, with leave to plaintiff to renew her application for alimony and counsel fee on proper papers. The moving papers presented on the existing application are insufficient. (See Lake v. Lake, 194 N. Y. 179; Stillman v. Stillman, 199 App. Div. 735.) Kelly, P. J., Manning, Kelby, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bartolotta v. Bartolotta, 206 A.D. 678 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1923).

206 A.D. 678 (Bartolotta v. Bartolotta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lake v. . Lake
87 N.E. 87 (New York Court of Appeals, 1909)
Stillman v. Stillman
199 A.D. 735 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1922)