Barto v. Benker
105 A. 731, 92 N.J.L. 501, 7 Gummere 501, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 275
This text of 105 A. 731 (Barto v. Benker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Barto v. Benker, 105 A. 731, 92 N.J.L. 501, 7 Gummere 501, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 275 (N.J. 1918).
Opinion
The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance• — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In Re Estate of Bray, No. Cv 01 75811 S (Jul. 24, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 9900 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
In Re Stephanie A., (Jun. 4, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 6168-C (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
105 A. 731, 92 N.J.L. 501, 7 Gummere 501, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barto-v-benker-nj-1918.