Barto v. Benker
105 A. 731, 92 N.J.L. 501, 7 Gummere 501, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 275
Opinion
The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance• — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barto v. Benker, 105 A. 731, 92 N.J.L. 501, 7 Gummere 501, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 275 (N.J. 1918).
105 A. 731 (Barto v. Benker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Estate of Bray, No. Cv 01 75811 S (Jul. 24, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 9900 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
In Re Stephanie A., (Jun. 4, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 6168-C (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)