Bartnett v. Major
164 F. 679, 90 C.C.A. 495, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4668
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedOctober 5, 1908
DocketNo. 1,604
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 164 F. 679 (Bartnett v. Major) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bartnett v. Major, 164 F. 679, 90 C.C.A. 495, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4668 (9th Cir. 1908).
Opinion
On the authority of the case of J. Dalzell Brown, Petitioner, v. Frieda R. Major and Others, Respondents, 164 Fed. 673, the petition for revision is dismissed at the petitioner’s cost.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Major v. Walker
138 P. 360 (California Court of Appeal, 1913)
Walker v. Woodside
164 F. 680 (Ninth Circuit, 1908)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
164 F. 679, 90 C.C.A. 495, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bartnett-v-major-ca9-1908.