Bartley v. Pitcher
This text of 131 Misc. 597 (Bartley v. Pitcher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As it is provided by subdivision 3 of section 26 of the Municipal Court Code that where no guardian is appointed for an infant defendant in accordance with the provisions of subdivision 2 of that section, “ the court, or a justice thereof, shall, at any time before judgment, make such appointment,” it was error, notwithstanding plaintiff’s application on the trial for the appointment of a guardian, to grant judgment for defendant dismissing the complaint because no guardian had been appointed.
Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.
All concur; present, Lydon, Levy and Crain, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
131 Misc. 597, 227 N.Y.S. 46, 1928 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bartley-v-pitcher-nyappterm-1928.