Bartley v. Church

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bartley v. Church

347 So. 2d 838, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15919

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 8, 1977

DocketNo. 76-1312

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 347 So. 2d 838 (Bartley v. Church) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bartley v. Church, 347 So. 2d 838, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15919 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

OTT, Judge.

We affirm the judgment, entered below in all its particulars with one exception. Ap-pellees/defendants counterclaimed for foreclosure and went into possession of the real property prior to the sale under the judgment. Thus, the appellees were trespassers — albeit unwittingly — from August 12, 1975 (the date the locks were changed), until August 13, 1976 (the date the certificate of title issued). See Martorano v. Spicola, 110 Fla. 55, 148 So. 585 (1933).

The court below granted damages to appellants for trespass in the amount of $500 apparently calculating wrongful possession to be of only two months duration. The measure of recovery is the reasonable rental value (which, according to the testimony, the court properly found to be was $250 a month) during the time of unauthorized occupancy. Anchorage Yacht Haven, Inc. v. Robertson, 264 So.2d 57 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972). Accordingly, the damages for the twelve month trespass should be $3,000.

Appellants are entitled to an offset against the foreclosure judgment entered against them in the amount of $3,000.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

McNULTY, Acting C. J., and SCHEB, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI