Bartley v. Andrews

208 A.D. 702
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 15, 1923
DocketAppeal No. 1
StatusPublished

This text of 208 A.D. 702 (Bartley v. Andrews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bartley v. Andrews, 208 A.D. 702 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Order denying motion to vacate warrant of attachment, and levies thereunder, and order of publication, reversed on the law, without costs, and motion granted, without costs. The defendants are sued [703]*703in an action at law as trustees of a common-law trust in an effort to reach property held by them as such trustees. The trust property cannot be reached in an action at law, the only remedy being an action in equity. (Hussey v. Arnold, 185 Mass. 202; King v. Stowell, 211 id. 246; Sears’ Trust Estates as Business Companies [2d ed.], p. 214, § 120.) The trust was apparently created in the State of Illinois. The statute of Massachusetts

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hussey v. Arnold
70 N.E. 87 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
208 A.D. 702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bartley-v-andrews-nyappdiv-1923.