Bartley v. Andrews
This text of 208 A.D. 702 (Bartley v. Andrews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying motion to vacate warrant of attachment, and levies thereunder, and order of publication, reversed on the law, without costs, and motion granted, without costs. The defendants are sued [703]*703in an action at law as trustees of a common-law trust in an effort to reach property held by them as such trustees. The trust property cannot be reached in an action at law, the only remedy being an action in equity. (Hussey v. Arnold, 185 Mass. 202; King v. Stowell, 211 id. 246; Sears’ Trust Estates as Business Companies [2d ed.], p. 214, § 120.) The trust was apparently created in the State of Illinois. The statute of Massachusetts
See Mass. Gen. Acts of 1916, chap. 184; 2 Mass. Gen. Laws (1921), 2078, chap. 182, $ 6.— [Rep.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
208 A.D. 702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bartley-v-andrews-nyappdiv-1923.