Bartley Bros. Construction Corp. v. National Surety Corp.

280 A.D. 798, 113 N.Y.S.2d 531, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3746
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 9, 1952
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 280 A.D. 798 (Bartley Bros. Construction Corp. v. National Surety Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bartley Bros. Construction Corp. v. National Surety Corp., 280 A.D. 798, 113 N.Y.S.2d 531, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3746 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

Opinion

Appeal by defendants, sureties on a payment bond, from an order which denied their motion to stay proceedings in the action until arbitration shall have been had between plaintiff and their principals on the bond. Order reversed on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with $10 costs. Respondent has been directed to proceed to arbitration of a dispute with appellants’ principals which pre[799]*799smnably involves the same issues as those presented in the instant action. (See Matter of Carlin Constr. Co. [Bartley Bros. Constr. Corp.], 280 App. Div. 801, decided herewith.) While appellants are not parties to the agreement which contains the provision for arbitration and consequently are not entitled to a stay as a matter of right (cf. Civ. Prac. Act, § 1451), the stay should be granted to avoid the simultaneous prosecution of the action and the arbitration proceeding. (Cf. Flash v. Goldman, 278 App. Div. 829.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mid-Atlantic Construction Corp. v. Guido
30 A.D.2d 232 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1968)
Edwards v. Bergner
22 A.D.2d 808 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1964)
In re the Arbitration between Ladin & D. & C. Textile Corp.
20 A.D.2d 8 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1963)
Corbetta Construction Co. v. George F. Driscoll Co.
17 A.D.2d 176 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
Major Concrete Co. v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance
27 Misc. 2d 113 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
Clearview Gardens First Corp. v. Little Bay Construction Corp.
9 Misc. 2d 574 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)
Starr v. O'Rourke
5 Misc. 2d 646 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)
Lake Beechwood Country Club, Inc. v. Peekskill Manor, Inc.
2 A.D.2d 865 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)
Dot's Boulevard Corp. v. Rosenfeld
285 A.D. 425 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
280 A.D. 798, 113 N.Y.S.2d 531, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bartley-bros-construction-corp-v-national-surety-corp-nyappdiv-1952.