Bartletta v. McFeeley
166 A. 144, 113 N.J. Eq. 67, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 982
This text of 166 A. 144 (Bartletta v. McFeeley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bartletta v. McFeeley, 166 A. 144, 113 N.J. Eq. 67, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 982 (N.J. 1933).
Opinion
The decree under review is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Bigelow.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
McGovern v. Van Riper
54 A.2d 469 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1947)
County of Aitkin v. City of Minneapolis
211 Minn. 223 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1941)
In Re Settlement of Robinette
300 N.W. 798 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1941)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
166 A. 144, 113 N.J. Eq. 67, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 982, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bartletta-v-mcfeeley-nj-1933.