Bartletta v. McFeeley
156 A. 658, 109 N.J. Eq. 241, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 1079
Opinions
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by YiceChancellor Bigelow, and reported in 107 N. J. Eq. 141.
For affirmance — The Ohiee-Justice, Tbenchard, Pae-Kee, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodikte, Daly, Donges, Yan Buseiee, Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, JJ. 14.
For reversal — Kone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bartletta v. McFeeley, 156 A. 658, 109 N.J. Eq. 241, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 1079 (N.J. 1931).
156 A. 658 (Bartletta v. McFeeley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Monroe v. Tielsch
525 P.2d 250 (Washington Supreme Court, 1974)
United States v. Rosen
343 F. Supp. 804 (S.D. New York, 1972)
Eddy v. Moore
487 P.2d 211 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1971)
State v. McKenna
226 A.2d 757 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1967)
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1957
Miller v. Domanski
97 A.2d 641 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)
McGovern v. Van Riper
54 A.2d 469 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1947)
Fernicola v. Keenan
39 A.2d 851 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)
Bednarik v. Bednarik
16 A.2d 80 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1940)