Bartlett v. Stinard
This text of 233 A.D. 891 (Bartlett v. Stinard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that, upon the plaintiff’s own ease, the sole proximate cause of the collision was, as matter of law, the disobedience of Stinard to the command of the statute providing for the maoagement of ears at a street intersection. (Shirley v. Larkin, 239 N. Y. 94.) We think -the decision of the trial judge was right, though the rule of law upon which he based that decision has since been disapproved by this court in Gochee v. Wagner (232 App. Div. 401), decided May 13, 1931. A11 concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Edgeomb and Thompson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
233 A.D. 891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bartlett-v-stinard-nyappdiv-1931.