Bartlett v. North Carolina Department of Correction
This text of 140 F. App'x 505 (Bartlett v. North Carolina Department of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Robert Andrew Bartlett, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bartlett v. North Carolina Dep’t of Corr., No. CA-04-576-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 4, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
140 F. App'x 505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bartlett-v-north-carolina-department-of-correction-ca4-2005.