Bartlett v. McCusker

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Bartlett v. McCusker

220 A.2d 162, 153 Conn. 745

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 7, 1966·Published

Opinion

The motion by the defendant The Hartford Courant Company to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in Tolland County is dismissed because there is no appeal pending.

The motion by the defendant The Hartford Times, Inc., to dismiss the appeal from the Superior [746] Court in Tolland County is dismissed because there is no appeal pending.

Philip S. Walker, for the appellee (defendant The Hartford Courant Company). Robert P. Volpe, for the appellee (defendant The Hartford Times, Inc.). Harry Hammer, for the appellant (plaintiff). Argued June 7 decided June 7, 1966

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The motion by the defendant The Hartford Courant Company to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in Tolland County is dismissed because there is no appeal pending.

The motion by the defendant The Hartford Times, Inc., to dismiss the appeal from the Superior [746] Court in Tolland County is dismissed because there is no appeal pending.

Philip S. Walker, for the appellee (defendant The Hartford Courant Company). Robert P. Volpe, for the appellee (defendant The Hartford Times, Inc.). Harry Hammer, for the appellant (plaintiff). Argued June 7 decided June 7, 1966

Bartlett v. McCusker, 220 A.2d 162, 153 Conn. 745 (Colo. 1966).

Pincite

220 A.2d 162 (Bartlett v. McCusker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.