Bartlett v. Mansfield

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Bartlett v. Mansfield

85 A. 756, 76 N.H. 582, 1913 N.H. LEXIS 54

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire

DecidedJanuary 7, 1913

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 85 A. 756 (Bartlett v. Mansfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bartlett v. Mansfield, 85 A. 756, 76 N.H. 582, 1913 N.H. LEXIS 54 (N.H. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Debt, against a selectman, to recover the penalty imposed by section 16, chapter 57, Public Statutes. Trial by jury and verdict for the defendant. Transferred from the January term, 1912, of the superior court by Mitchell, J., on ¿xceptions taken by the plaintiff. On the ground that the private action for a penalty was abolished by chapter 31, Laws 1899, judgment was ordered for the defendant without considering the exceptions. State v. McConnell, 70 N. H. 158, 161; Noyes v. Edgerly, 71 N. H. 500, 503, 505.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Debt, against a selectman, to recover the penalty imposed by section 16, chapter 57, Public Statutes. Trial by jury and verdict for the defendant. Transferred from the January term, 1912, of the superior court by Mitchell, J., on ¿xceptions taken by the plaintiff. On the ground that the private action for a penalty was abolished by chapter 31, Laws 1899, judgment was ordered for the defendant without considering the exceptions. State v. McConnell, 70 N. H. 158, 161; Noyes v. Edgerly, 71 N. H. 500, 503, 505.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 A. 756, 76 N.H. 582, 1913 N.H. LEXIS 54, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bartlett-v-mansfield-nh-1913.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack