Bartlett v. Hawkes

127 So. 495, 99 Fla. 754, 1930 Fla. LEXIS 1571
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 5, 1930·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected; and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

■Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Bueord, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bartlett v. Hawkes, 127 So. 495, 99 Fla. 754, 1930 Fla. LEXIS 1571 (Fla. 1930).

127 So. 495 (Bartlett v. Hawkes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.