Bartlett v. Cooper

4 Kan. 119
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedJuly 15, 1866
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 Kan. 119 (Bartlett v. Cooper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bartlett v. Cooper, 4 Kan. 119 (kan 1866).

Opinion

By the Court,

Bailen, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff in error, administrator of the estate of Silas Armstrong, deceased, to restrain defendants in error, by a perpetual injunction, from an invasion of the rights and franchises of the plaintiff, in the construction of a bridge over the Kansas river, within the limits of the plaintiffs’ [120]*120ferry. In the absence of Chief Justice Crozier, July term, 1866, the cause was heard by Justices Bailey and Saeeord, and taken under advisement, and said justices being equally divided in opinion, the judgment of the court below stands affirmed.

Bailey and Saeeord, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Higgs v. State Industrial Commission
1946 OK 193 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Kan. 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bartlett-v-cooper-kan-1866.