Bartlett v. CONTINENTAL DIVIDE INSURANCE COMPANY

730 P.2d 308, 1986 Colo. LEXIS 684
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedDecember 8, 1986
Docket85SC31
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 730 P.2d 308 (Bartlett v. CONTINENTAL DIVIDE INSURANCE COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bartlett v. CONTINENTAL DIVIDE INSURANCE COMPANY, 730 P.2d 308, 1986 Colo. LEXIS 684 (Colo. 1986).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case has been heard and reviewed by the court. Chief Justice Quinn, Justice Rovira, and Justice Vollaek favor affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals. Bartlett v. Continental Divide Insurance Co., 697 P.2d 412 (Colo.App.1984). Justice Erickson, Justice Lohr, and Justice Kirshbaum are in favor of reversal. Justice Dubofsky does not participate.

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed by operation of law because of an equally divided court. C.A.R. 35(e).

DUBOFSKY, J., does not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Armed Forces Bank, N.A. v. Hicks
2014 COA 74 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2014)
Hoang v. Monterra Homes (Powderhorn) LLC
129 P.3d 1028 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2006)
Kane v. Royal Insurance Co. of America
768 P.2d 678 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
730 P.2d 308, 1986 Colo. LEXIS 684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bartlett-v-continental-divide-insurance-company-colo-1986.