Bartlett v. CONTINENTAL DIVIDE INSURANCE COMPANY
730 P.2d 308, 1986 Colo. LEXIS 684
Opinion
This case has been heard and reviewed by the court. Chief Justice Quinn, Justice Rovira, and Justice Vollaek favor affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals. Bartlett v. Continental Divide Insurance Co., 697 P.2d 412 (Colo.App.1984). Justice Erickson, Justice Lohr, and Justice Kirshbaum are in favor of reversal. Justice Dubofsky does not participate.
Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed by operation of law because of an equally divided court. C.A.R. 35(e).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bartlett v. CONTINENTAL DIVIDE INSURANCE COMPANY, 730 P.2d 308, 1986 Colo. LEXIS 684 (Colo. 1986).
730 P.2d 308 (Bartlett v. CONTINENTAL DIVIDE INSURANCE COMPANY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Armed Forces Bank, N.A. v. Hicks
2014 COA 74 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2014)
Hoang v. Monterra Homes (Powderhorn) LLC
129 P.3d 1028 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2006)
Adams-Arapahoe Joint School District No. 28-J, Cross-Appellant v. The Continental Insurance Company, a Corporation, Cross-Appellee
891 F.2d 772 (Tenth Circuit, 1989)
Kane v. Royal Insurance Co. of America
768 P.2d 678 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1989)