Bartlett v. Bartlett

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bartlett v. Bartlett

724 So. 2d 1265, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 846, 1999 WL 44448

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 3, 1999

DocketNo. 98-0462

StatusPublished

This text of 724 So. 2d 1265 (Bartlett v. Bartlett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bartlett v. Bartlett, 724 So. 2d 1265, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 846, 1999 WL 44448 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

FARMER, J.

REVERSED. On remand the trial court shall re-enter a final order on the motion for modification and then accept appellant’s motion for rehearing under rule 1.530 as timely filed. The court is free to hold a hearing on the motion for rehearing or not as the court may be advised, but in any case shall enter an order disposing of the motion for rehearing. Upon the entry of the order disposing of the motion for rehearing, either of the parties are then free to seek appellate review by the timely filing of a notice of appeal of the final order on the motion for modification as then rendered by the disposition of the motion for rehearing.

GUNTHER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FARMER, J.

REVERSED. On remand the trial court shall re-enter a final order on the motion for modification and then accept appellant’s motion for rehearing under rule 1.530 as timely filed. The court is free to hold a hearing on the motion for rehearing or not as the court may be advised, but in any case shall enter an order disposing of the motion for rehearing. Upon the entry of the order disposing of the motion for rehearing, either of the parties are then free to seek appellate review by the timely filing of a notice of appeal of the final order on the motion for modification as then rendered by the disposition of the motion for rehearing.

GUNTHER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

724 So. 2d 1265, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 846, 1999 WL 44448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bartlett-v-bartlett-fladistctapp-1999.