Bartlett v. Barber

787 S.E.2d 381, 368 N.C. 914, 2016 N.C. LEXIS 554
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 9, 2016·No. 091P16·Published

Opinion

1. Pit’s Pro Se Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (COA15-72)

1. Dismissed

2. Pit’s Pro Se Motion to Appoint Counsel

2. Dismissed

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bartlett v. Barber, 787 S.E.2d 381, 368 N.C. 914, 2016 N.C. LEXIS 554 (N.C. 2016).

787 S.E.2d 381 (Bartlett v. Barber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.