Bartlett v. American Mutual Liability Insurance

170 S.E. 822, 47 Ga. App. 504, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 535
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 14, 1933·No. 22550·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

MacIntyre, J.

Where the evidence showed that the insured employer did not have as many as ten employees in this State, and where the evidence did not authorize a finding that either the employer or the employee for whose injury claim was made had ever elected to come under the provisions of the workmen’s compensation act, the Industrial Commission had no jurisdiction of the claim, and properly so held. It follows that the judge of the superior court, on an appeal from the judgment of the commission, did not err in sustaining the same. Vandergriff v. Shepard, 39 Ga. App. 791 (148 S. E. 596) ; Ga. L. 1920, pp. 167, 177; Ga. L. 1925, pp. 282, 283; Code, Park’s Supp. 1922, § 3154(o), Michie, § 3154(15).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Guerry, J., concur. Smith, Hammond, Smith & Bloodivorih, B. B. L. Field, William, H. Smith, for plaintiff. McDaniel, Neely & Marshall, Harry L. Greene, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bartlett v. American Mutual Liability Insurance, 170 S.E. 822, 47 Ga. App. 504, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 535 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933).

170 S.E. 822 (Bartlett v. American Mutual Liability Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller v. Denver Post, Inc.
322 P.2d 661 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1958)