Bartlett v. Aitken
48 Cal. 405, 1874 Cal. LEXIS 165
This text of 48 Cal. 405 (Bartlett v. Aitken) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bartlett v. Aitken, 48 Cal. 405, 1874 Cal. LEXIS 165 (Cal. 1874).
Opinion
The plaintiff seeks to recover damages for a breach of a verbal contract to r¡ convey real estate. No such action can be maintained, at law.
If it be claimed that the conveyance from plaintiff to defendant was intended as a mortgage, the former must apply to a Court of equity so to declare.
Judgment sustaining the demurrer to the amended complaint is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Paul v. Layne & Bowler Corp.
71 P.2d 817 (California Supreme Court, 1937)
Elsberry v. Sexton
61 Fla. 162 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1911)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
48 Cal. 405, 1874 Cal. LEXIS 165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bartlett-v-aitken-cal-1874.