Bartlett v. Aitken
48 Cal. 405, 1874 Cal. LEXIS 165
Opinion
The plaintiff seeks to recover damages for a breach of a verbal contract to r¡ convey real estate. No such action can be maintained, at law.
If it be claimed that the conveyance from plaintiff to defendant was intended as a mortgage, the former must apply to a Court of equity so to declare.
Judgment sustaining the demurrer to the amended complaint is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bartlett v. Aitken, 48 Cal. 405, 1874 Cal. LEXIS 165 (Cal. 1874).
48 Cal. 405 (Bartlett v. Aitken) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Paul v. Layne & Bowler Corp.
71 P.2d 817 (California Supreme Court, 1937)
Elsberry v. Sexton
61 Fla. 162 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1911)