Bartleson v. the Nat. City Bank of N.Y.

Supreme Court of Florida

Bartleson v. the Nat. City Bank of N.Y.

110 So. 554, 92 Fla. 817

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 27, 1926·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that under the allegations of the bill of complaint an equity may be proven, it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the order of the Circuit Court overruling a demurrer to the bill of complaint be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that under the allegations of the bill of complaint an equity may be proven, it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the order of the Circuit Court overruling a demurrer to the bill of complaint be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Bartleson v. the Nat. City Bank of N.Y., 110 So. 554, 92 Fla. 817 (Fla. 1926).

Pincite

110 So. 554 (Bartleson v. the Nat. City Bank of N.Y.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.