Bartleson-Burton v. Macys Corporate Office

Opinion

1 2 5 CHAUNA BARTLESON-BURTON, Case No. 2:22-cv-02056-CDS-NJK 7 Plaintiff(s), ORDER 8] v. 9] MACY’S CORPORATE OFFICE, 10 Defendant(s). 11 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and has requested authority pursuant to 12] 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. Docket No. 1. Pending before the Court is 13] Plaintiff's complaint, Docket No. 1-1, which must be screened pursuant to § 1915(e). 14 An employment plaintiff must administratively exhaust her remedies before filing suit. 15] See, e.g., You v. Longs Drugs Stores Cal., LLC, 937 F. Supp. 2d 1237, 1248-49 (D. Haw. 2013). 16] The plaintiff must attach to her complaint the right to sue letter issued in relation to those administrative proceedings. See, e.g., Delaney v. Lynwood Unified School Dist., 2008 WL 18] 11338726, at *3 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 7, 2008); Docket No. 1-1 at 5 “Note: Attach a copy of the Notice of Right to Sue letter from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to this complaint” 20|| (emphasis in original)). In this case, Plaintiff references receiving a right to sue letter, but she did 21|| not attach it to her complaint. Docket No. 1-1 at 5. 22 Accordingly, Plaintiff must file on the docket a copy of the right to sue letter that she 23|| received no later than January 12, 2023. Failure to comply with this order may result in the recommended dismissal of Plaintiff’s case. 26 Dated: December 13, 2022 27 re = Nancy J. Ko 28 United States Magistrate Judge