Bartle v. Zoning Bd. of Adj.
This text of 137 A.2d 239 (Bartle v. Zoning Bd. of Adj.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Bartle, Appellant,
v.
Zoning Board of Adjustment.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
*208 Before JONES, C.J., BELL, CHIDSEY, MUSMANNO, ARNOLD, JONES and COHEN, JJ.
Austin Miller Lee, for appellants.
Murray H. Shusterman, Deputy City Solicitor, with him Gordon Cavanaugh, Assistant City Solicitor, and David Berger, City Solicitor, for City of Philadelphia, appellee.
Frank F. Truscott, with him John V. Horan and Trommer, Silver & Barsky, for intervening defendant, appellee.
*209 OPINION PER CURIAM, January 8, 1958:
The order of the court below dismissing the appeal from the decision of the zoning board of adjustment is affirmed on the opinion of President Judge BROWN, 10 Pa. D. & C. 2d 613.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
137 A.2d 239, 391 Pa. 207, 1958 Pa. LEXIS 519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bartle-v-zoning-bd-of-adj-pa-1958.