Bartle v. MERAMEC GROUP, INC.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bartle v. MERAMEC GROUP, INC.

236 S.W.3d 124, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1451, 2007 WL 3071798

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 23, 2007

DocketED 89487

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 236 S.W.3d 124 (Bartle v. MERAMEC GROUP, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bartle v. MERAMEC GROUP, INC., 236 S.W.3d 124, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1451, 2007 WL 3071798 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Employer appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Employer appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

236 S.W.3d 124, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1451, 2007 WL 3071798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bartle-v-meramec-group-inc-moctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack