Bartle v. MERAMEC GROUP, INC.
236 S.W.3d 124, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1451, 2007 WL 3071798
Opinion
ORDER
Employer appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bartle v. MERAMEC GROUP, INC., 236 S.W.3d 124, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1451, 2007 WL 3071798 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).
236 S.W.3d 124 (Bartle v. MERAMEC GROUP, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
DECKER-WEGENER v. Wegener
236 S.W.3d 124 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)