Bartle v. May

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bartle v. May

54 A.D.2d 532, 386 N.Y.S.2d 716, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13793

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 30, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 54 A.D.2d 532 (Bartle v. May) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bartle v. May, 54 A.D.2d 532, 386 N.Y.S.2d 716, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13793 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered August 27, 1976, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to section 330 of the Election Law, to validate a petition designating her as a candidate of the Liberal Party for the office of Representative of Congress from the 30th Congressional District. Special Term properly held that the irregularity of petitioner’s designating petition in naming more than one committee to fill vacancies was fatal to the petition (Matter of Carey v Power, 18 NY2d 845; Matter of Lisa v Power, 16 NY2d 851; Matter of Di Lorenzo v Heffernan 187 Mise 766, affd 271 App Div 802, affd 296 NY 687). Judgment affirmed, without costs. Koreman, P. J., Kane, Mahoney, Main and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered August 27, 1976, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to section 330 of the Election Law, to validate a petition designating her as a candidate of the Liberal Party for the office of Representative of Congress from the 30th Congressional District. Special Term properly held that the irregularity of petitioner’s designating petition in naming more than one committee to fill vacancies was fatal to the petition (Matter of Carey v Power, 18 NY2d 845; Matter of Lisa v Power, 16 NY2d 851; Matter of Di Lorenzo v Heffernan 187 Mise 766, affd 271 App Div 802, affd 296 NY 687). Judgment affirmed, without costs. Koreman, P. J., Kane, Mahoney, Main and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 532, 386 N.Y.S.2d 716, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bartle-v-may-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack