Bartindale v. Adams

136 N.Y.S. 142

This text of 136 N.Y.S. 142 (Bartindale v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bartindale v. Adams, 136 N.Y.S. 142 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff sues for rent of a furnished house leased for immediate occupancy for a term of five months. One of the defenses urged by the defendant is that the house was untenantable by reason of the presence of vermin. The learned trial justice in a careful opinion held that this defense was not made out, because there was no implied covenant that the demised premises are suitable or fit for occupation. This court has decided, in the case of Morgenthau v. Ehrich, 136 N. Y. Supp. 140 (this term), that under the circumstances shown in this case there is such an implied covenant

Judgment should therefore be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morgenthau v. Ehrich
77 Misc. 139 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 N.Y.S. 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bartindale-v-adams-nyappterm-1912.