Bartholomew v. Union Paper & Bag Co.

113 F. 289, 51 C.C.A. 250, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 3960
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedJanuary 21, 1902
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 113 F. 289 (Bartholomew v. Union Paper & Bag Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bartholomew v. Union Paper & Bag Co., 113 F. 289, 51 C.C.A. 250, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 3960 (7th Cir. 1902).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case is before us on an appeal from an interlocutory order restraining the appellants from selling, disposing of, or in any way incumbering a certain patent application filed by them in the patent office in January, 1901, and from issuing, or causing to be issued, a patent on such application, and from entering into any contracts or agreements or taking any steps which will jeopardize appellee’s interests in certain inventions embodied in a contract entered into between the parties August 27, 1900, or in any improve[290]*290'ments upon such inventions. It is enough now to say that appellants have failed to show that the provisional order was improvidently entered; and, inasmuch as the case will probably be before us again on its final hearing, no further reasons for our judgment need be given.

The decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kerr v. City of New Orleans
126 F. 920 (Fifth Circuit, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 F. 289, 51 C.C.A. 250, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 3960, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bartholomew-v-union-paper-bag-co-ca7-1902.