Bartholomew v. Union Paper & Bag Co.

113 F. 289, 51 C.C.A. 250, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 3960
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided January 21, 1902·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case is before us on an appeal from an interlocutory order restraining the appellants from selling, disposing of, or in any way incumbering a certain patent application filed by them in the patent office in January, 1901, and from issuing, or causing to be issued, a patent on such application, and from entering into any contracts or agreements or taking any steps which will jeopardize appellee’s interests in certain inventions embodied in a contract entered into between the parties August 27, 1900, or in any improve[290]*290'ments upon such inventions. It is enough now to say that appellants have failed to show that the provisional order was improvidently entered; and, inasmuch as the case will probably be before us again on its final hearing, no further reasons for our judgment need be given.

The decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bartholomew v. Union Paper & Bag Co., 113 F. 289, 51 C.C.A. 250, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 3960 (7th Cir. 1902).

113 F. 289 (Bartholomew v. Union Paper & Bag Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kerr v. City of New Orleans
126 F. 920 (Fifth Circuit, 1903)