Bartholomew v. Union Paper & Bag Co.
Opinion
This case is before us on an appeal from an interlocutory order restraining the appellants from selling, disposing of, or in any way incumbering a certain patent application filed by them in the patent office in January, 1901, and from issuing, or causing to be issued, a patent on such application, and from entering into any contracts or agreements or taking any steps which will jeopardize appellee’s interests in certain inventions embodied in a contract entered into between the parties August 27, 1900, or in any improve[290]*290'ments upon such inventions. It is enough now to say that appellants have failed to show that the provisional order was improvidently entered; and, inasmuch as the case will probably be before us again on its final hearing, no further reasons for our judgment need be given.
The decree is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
113 F. 289 (Bartholomew v. Union Paper & Bag Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.