Bartholomew v. Mayor of Elizabeth
24 A. 1024, 53 N.J.L. 666, 24 Vroom 666, 1891 N.J. LEXIS 14
Opinion
The judgment in this case is affirmed, for the reasons given-by the court below.
■ For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice,. Depue, Dixon, Knapp, Magie, Reed, Clement, Smith,, Whitaker. 10.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bartholomew v. Mayor of Elizabeth, 24 A. 1024, 53 N.J.L. 666, 24 Vroom 666, 1891 N.J. LEXIS 14 (N.J. 1891).
24 A. 1024 (Bartholomew v. Mayor of Elizabeth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wade v. Markwell & Co.
258 P.2d 497 (California Court of Appeal, 1953)
Klein v. Farmer
194 P.2d 106 (California Court of Appeal, 1948)
Brown v. Royal Battery Corp.
25 A.2d 203 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1942)
Berarducci v. Diano
198 A. 351 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1938)
Wolkowsky v. Kirchick
88 So. 261 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1921)
Lawrance v. Ward
77 P. 229 (Utah Supreme Court, 1904)
Veerhoff v. Miller
51 N.Y.S. 1048 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)