Bartholomew v. Lefrak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bartholomew v. Lefrak

188 A.D.2d 576, 592 N.Y.S.2d 608, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14476

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 21, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 188 A.D.2d 576 (Bartholomew v. Lefrak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bartholomew v. Lefrak, 188 A.D.2d 576, 592 N.Y.S.2d 608, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14476 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Samuel J. Lefrak, Ethel Lefrak, Emanuel Schaffer, and Lefrak Management Corp., appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hentel, J.), entered November 16, 1990, which denied their motion to compel disclosure of information pursuant to CPLR 3101 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We reject the appellants’ contention that the plaintiff failed to properly respond to their request for information on the plaintiff’s expert witness (see, CPLR 3101 [d] [1] [i]). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, O’Brien, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Samuel J. Lefrak, Ethel Lefrak, Emanuel Schaffer, and Lefrak Management Corp., appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hentel, J.), entered November 16, 1990, which denied their motion to compel disclosure of information pursuant to CPLR 3101 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We reject the appellants’ contention that the plaintiff failed to properly respond to their request for information on the plaintiff’s expert witness (see, CPLR 3101 [d] [1] [i]). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, O’Brien, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

188 A.D.2d 576, 592 N.Y.S.2d 608, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bartholomew-v-lefrak-nyappdiv-1992.