Bartholomay v. Bartholomay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bartholomay v. Bartholomay

26 A.D.3d 794, 807 N.Y.S.2d 908

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 3, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 26 A.D.3d 794 (Bartholomay v. Bartholomay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bartholomay v. Bartholomay, 26 A.D.3d 794, 807 N.Y.S.2d 908 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (Frank S. Cook, J.), entered May 12, 2003 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4. The order, among other things, terminated petitioner’s child support obligation.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for the [795]*795reasons stated in decision at Family Court. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Martoche, Pine and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (Frank S. Cook, J.), entered May 12, 2003 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4. The order, among other things, terminated petitioner’s child support obligation.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for the [795]*795reasons stated in decision at Family Court. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Martoche, Pine and Hayes, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.3d 794, 807 N.Y.S.2d 908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bartholomay-v-bartholomay-nyappdiv-2006.