Bartholomay Co. v. Regan

123 Misc. 491, 205 N.Y.S. 747, 1924 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 999
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJune 2, 1924
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 123 Misc. 491 (Bartholomay Co. v. Regan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bartholomay Co. v. Regan, 123 Misc. 491, 205 N.Y.S. 747, 1924 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 999 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1924).

Opinion

Rodenbeck, J.

The action is upon a promissory note. The examination relates to affirmative defenses. The plaintiff must be prepared to meet these defenses. It will be sufficient for it to prove the note and its non-payment to make out a cause of action, but after the defendant has put in evidence of his defense, the burden shifts upon the plaintiff to show that it has a valid and subsisting [492]*492claim and the amount of the claim. Under such circumstances an examination by the plaintiff as to defendant’s affirmative defenses is permitted. Civ. Prac. Act, § 290; Schweinburg v. Altman, 131 App. Div. 795; Globe Elevator Co. v. American Molasses Co., 197 id. 921. Motion denied, with ten dollars costs to abide the event.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bay Parkway National Bank v. Shalom
146 Misc. 431 (New York Supreme Court, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 Misc. 491, 205 N.Y.S. 747, 1924 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bartholomay-co-v-regan-nysupct-1924.