Bartholemew v. Chautauque County Bank

19 Wend. 99
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1838
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 19 Wend. 99 (Bartholemew v. Chautauque County Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bartholemew v. Chautauque County Bank, 19 Wend. 99 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1838).

Opinion

By the Court,

Bronson, J.

The statute gives power to the court to amend any process in any action pending therein. The only limitation is, that process on which a defendant shall have been arrested, shall not be amended in the return day thereof. 2 R. S. 424, § 1 and 3. In Lynch v. Mechanics’ Bank, 13 Johns. R. 127, it was held that an original writ was not amendable. No good reason is perceived why the above statute should not include originals as well as other process. The plaintiff, therefore, may amend the summons as to ifs teste, and may insert a si te fecerit clause on payment of the costs of this motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Talcott v. Rosenberg
8 Abb. Pr. 287 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1870)
Cartwright v. Chabert
3 Tex. 261 (Texas Supreme Court, 1848)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 Wend. 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bartholemew-v-chautauque-county-bank-nysupct-1838.