Barthel v. City of New Orleans

26 La. Ann. 340
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedApril 15, 1874
DocketNo. 4805
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 26 La. Ann. 340 (Barthel v. City of New Orleans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barthel v. City of New Orleans, 26 La. Ann. 340 (La. 1874).

Opinion

Morgan, J.

Plaintiff has injoined the defendant from collecting [341]*341certain rates fixed upon for the lease of a stall in St. Mary’s Market. He contends that it is a tax upon liis occupation, which is unequal and oppressive and in violation of the constitution.

What the city demands of him is a rent and not a tax. He is to pay a certain price per day for the stall which he occupies, and a certain sum on each beef, sheep, etc., which he offers for sale. We do not see in what' this violates the constitution. The ordinance was in force when he rented the stall. It was then a contract entered into between himself and the city, the performance of which he can not injoin the city from exacting.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the district court be avoided, annulled and reversed, that there be judgment in favor of defendant, and the injunction herein issued be dissolved, the costs to be borne by plaintiff.

Rehearing refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Swayze v. City of Monroe
40 So. 926 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 La. Ann. 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barthel-v-city-of-new-orleans-la-1874.