Bartha v. Simmons

Connecticut Appellate Court

Bartha v. Simmons

543 A.2d 306, 15 Conn. App. 813, 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 262

CourtConnecticut Appellate Court

DecidedJune 23, 1988

Docket6109

StatusPublished

This text of 543 A.2d 306 (Bartha v. Simmons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bartha v. Simmons, 543 A.2d 306, 15 Conn. App. 813, 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 262 (Colo. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff is appealing the judgment of the trial court rendered upon the grant of the defendants’ motion for summary judgment.

Our review of the record with particular regard to the documents submitted to the trial court in support of the defendants’ motion for summary judgment clearly indicates that the trial court resolved disputed issues of fact in ruling on the motion. The documents disclose the existence of genuine issues of material fact. Therefore, the defendants were not entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fairfield Lease Corporation v. Romano’s Auto Service, 4 Conn. App. 495, 499, 495 A.2d 286 (1985).

There is error, the judgment is set aside and the case is remanded for further proceedings according to law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff is appealing the judgment of the trial court rendered upon the grant of the defendants’ motion for summary judgment.

Our review of the record with particular regard to the documents submitted to the trial court in support of the defendants’ motion for summary judgment clearly indicates that the trial court resolved disputed issues of fact in ruling on the motion. The documents disclose the existence of genuine issues of material fact. Therefore, the defendants were not entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fairfield Lease Corporation v. Romano’s Auto Service, 4 Conn. App. 495, 499, 495 A.2d 286 (1985).

There is error, the judgment is set aside and the case is remanded for further proceedings according to law.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

543 A.2d 306, 15 Conn. App. 813, 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bartha-v-simmons-connappct-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack