Barth v. Wickham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Barth v. Wickham

1 A.D.2d 691, 148 N.Y.S.2d 457, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3640

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 29, 1955

StatusPublished

This text of 1 A.D.2d 691 (Barth v. Wickham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barth v. Wickham, 1 A.D.2d 691, 148 N.Y.S.2d 457, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3640 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover $6,500 from an escrow agent, the jury rendered a verdict for that amount in favor of respondent. An order was made granting respondent’s motion to add interest from March 2, 1950. The appeal is from the judgment entered on said verdict and order, from that order and from an order denying a motion to set aside the verdict. The notice of appeal also brings up for review an order denying a motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Judgment and orders unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Schmidt, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ. [See post, p. 825.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover $6,500 from an escrow agent, the jury rendered a verdict for that amount in favor of respondent. An order was made granting respondent’s motion to add interest from March 2, 1950. The appeal is from the judgment entered on said verdict and order, from that order and from an order denying a motion to set aside the verdict. The notice of appeal also brings up for review an order denying a motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Judgment and orders unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Schmidt, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ. [See post, p. 825.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 A.D.2d 691, 148 N.Y.S.2d 457, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barth-v-wickham-nyappdiv-1955.